Jump to content

Talk:Chris Weidman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

KO over Munoz

[edit]

Fight officially ruled KO, not TKO. http://www.sherdog.com/events/UFC-on-Fuel-TV-4-Munoz-vs-Weidman-21725 — Preceding unsigned comment added by NerdNinja9 (talk • contribs) 02:57, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Descent

[edit]

I think his last name Weidman (Weidmann [vaitman]) is german or nethersaxon. Whos is he? 85.26.241.116 (talk) 08:04, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Runk kari

[edit]

There stands "purple belt under Runk kari". Runkkari is finnish slang and means masturbator. I think this is only a bad joke. There is no BJJ black belt named Runk kari. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.226.65.94 (talk) 21:08, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

[edit]

Thought this pic might be useful in the article, if someone wants to work it in.

Chris Weidman knock out Anderson Silva.

Kevlar (talk) 22:11, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done--Phospheros (talk) 02:27, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 January 2014

[edit]

Please change "the #5 pound-for-pound fighter by ESPN" to "the #3 pound-for-pound fighter by ESPN".

70.88.95.202 (talk) 17:55, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Chris Weidman day" Nassau County

[edit]

(in the UFC Middleweight Champion section) I thought this was just some kind of informal appraisal: " In honor of Weidman's victory, Nassau County proclaimed July seventeenth "Chris Weidman Day"."

So i checked it myself. and it's actually official. Perhaps it is better to link to a better citation in order to avoid any ambiguity with other readers (like me) in the future.

http://www.nassaucountyny.gov/agencies/countyexecutive/newsrelease/2013/07-17-2013a.html109.66.26.40 (talk) 12:08, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anon126 (talk - contribs) 17:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Title Controversy?

[edit]

Should it not at least be mentioned that some people consider the wins over Anderson Silva to be controversial due to the unusual nature of both victories? There doesn't need to be any sort of commentary about the legitimacy of the controversy, but I think acknowledgement would at least be in order. This seems to be common practice in articles about other fight-sports controversies, like the "Long Count" in the Jack Dempsey article or the "Phantom Punch" with Muhammad Ali. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schuster1 (talk • contribs) 18:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think those things are really comparable. Silva obviously lost both fights. It could be argued it wasn't because of his skill (ie. first time he was screwing around, second time his leg broke), but it's perfectly clear there wasn't any kind of faking going on. If Silva wants to prove he is better, he has to clearly beat Weidman, and preferably more than once. Until he does anything like that, I don't think there is any controversy. 62.78.251.108 (talk) 12:00, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chris Weidman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Weidman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:53, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay-per-view bouts?

[edit]

What is the purpose of the Pay-per-view bouts section? It's incomplete if it is meant to be PPV that Weidman has participated in.

It should either be all the events, events where Weidman was the Main event, or not be listed at all. Dstrange (talk) 01:30, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chris_Weidman&oldid=1212723912"